The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

By S. Chatrchyan, G. Hmayakyan, V. Khachatryan, A. Sirunyan, W. Adam, T. Bauer, T. Bergauer, H. Bergauer, M. Dragicevic, J. Erö and 3,068 more. 2008

7,266 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

1. Cms Collaboration
2. Atlas Collaboration
3. Gudrun Heinrich
4. M. Schönherr
5. A. Larkoski
6. Ansgar Denner
7. I. Moult
8. S. Höche

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

1. I. Moult
2. Benjamin Nachman
3. Luke de Oliveira
4. Michela Paganini
5. Gage DeZoort
6. Song Han
7. Alexander Belyaev
8. Juan Rojo

Citations in the corpus

• Learning Particle Physics by Example: Location-Aware Generative Adversarial Networks for Physics Synthesis (2017, methodology): “This is analogous to a calorimeter without longitudinal segmentation (e.g. the CMS detector [25]).”
• Dark matter, dark energy, and alternate models: A review (2017, neutral): “Gravitational wave astronomy, starting with the event GW150914 (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, Abbott et al., 2016), could be fundamental for discriminating various theories of gravity.”