Credal networks

By Fabio Gagliardi Cozman. Artificial Intelligence, 2000

392 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7fcd78b3d76b6350b5c4670592f768822e8a315c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Willem Waegeman
2. Jon Williamson
3. Eyke Hüllermeier
4. Aadirupa Saha

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

1. Eyke Hüllermeier
2. Willem Waegeman

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Laurence Smith
2. Eyke Hüllermeier
3. Klaus Hubacek
4. Willem Waegeman

Citations in the corpus

• Motivating Objective Bayesianism: From Empirical Constraints to Objective Probabilities (2006, background): “33Cozman (2000) develops a computational framework for interval-valued beliefs.”
• The role of expert opinion in environmental modelling (2012, background): “The extension of probabilistic networks to imprecise probabilities 28 has been realised through credal networks (see review by Cozman, 2000), but without any 29 application in environmental modelling that we know of.”
• Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning: an introduction to concepts and methods (2019, background): “In the literature on imprecise probability, these are also called credal sets (Cozman, 2000; Zaffalon, 2002b).”