Comparison between two different antennas for UWB on-body propagation measurements

By A. Alomainy, Yang Hao, Clive G. Parini, Peter Hall. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 2005

214 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7fc8540eb426b9bebd9a3d6c385aa4f76de33bea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. Peter Hall
2. Leo Van Biesen
3. Paolo Nepa
4. Claude Desset
5. Philippe De Doncker

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Peter Hall

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Leo Van Biesen
2. Paolo Nepa
3. Claude Desset
4. Philippe De Doncker

Citations in the corpus

• Antennas and propagation for on-body communication systems (2007, background): “The UWB antennas were a printed horn shaped self-complementary antenna (HSCA) and a planar inverted cone antenna (PICA), [ 4 ], Fig 4. The printed HSCA exhibits approximately constant impedance and absolute gain across the UWB band.”
• UWB on-body radio channel modeling using ray theory and subband FDTD method (2006, methodology): “Generally, the greater number of sub-bands, the more accurate the sub-band FDTD model is.”
• Ultra-wideband channel model for communication around the human body (2006, background): “Channel parameters may depend on the position of the antenna around the body [2], [3], [5], [ 7 ].”
• Statistical Analysis and Performance Evaluation for On-Body Radio Propagation With Microstrip Patch Antennas (2007, unknown): “the propagation channel [7]–[9], [18].”