This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture
By Britney Summit-Gil. New Media & Society, 2016
438 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7fb8f6c4ef8f09db6ce8d49937913f3ee8602dbd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
In Sociology and Political Science
- Amy S. Bruckman
- Eric Gilbert
- Kathleen C. Fraser
- Fabio Giglietto
- Svetlana Kiritchenko
- Isar Nejadgholi
- Shagun Jhaver
- Torill Elvira Mortensen
Citations in the corpus
- Online Harassment and Content Moderation (2018, methodology): “is is similar to what Whitney Phillips found in her work on trolls in which she provides an empirical account of the identities, aitudes and practices of trolls, and their impact on the digital media environments [37].”
- Deepfakes generation and detection: state-of-the-art, open challenges, countermeasures, and way forward (2021, background): “Trolls: Independent Trolls are hobbyists who spread inflammatory information to cause disorder and reactions in society by playing with the emotions of people [18].”
- Critical Race Theory for HCI (2020, background): “The well-documented phenomenon of online trolling is something that racial minorities are intimately familiar with every time they dare to speak truth to power online [24, 98].”
- Anger, Fear, and Games: The Long Event of #GamerGate (2018, background): “When this game was (Phillips, 2015, p. 61) or weird magazine subscriptions.”
- Confronting Abusive Language Online: A Survey from the Ethical and Human Rights Perspective (2020, background): “In other words, it is not so much a technological, but rather a cultural problem (Phillips, 2015).”
- Nathaniel Persily e Joshua A. Tucker (a cura di). Social Media and Democracy. The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform (2021, background): “…be relatively marginal and subcultural phenomena are now mainstream and widely experienced, enabled by digital technologies but fed by culturally sanctioned impulses and often amplified by political actors as well as the corporate interest of some publishers and platform companies (Phillips 2015).”