Testing for Multiple Bubbles: Limit Theory of Real Time Detectors
By Peter C. B. Phillips, Shuping Shi, Jun Yu. 2015
440 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This article provides the limit theory of real‐time dating algorithms for bubble detection that were suggested in Phillips, Wu, and Yu (PWY; International Economic Review 52 [2011], 201–26) and in a companion paper by the present authors (Phillips, Shi, and Yu, 2015; PSY; International Economic Review 56 [2015a], 1099–1134. Bubbles are modeled using mildly explosive bubble episodes that are embedded within longer periods where the data evolve as a stochastic trend, thereby capturing normal market behavior as well as exuberance and collapse. Both the PWY and PSY estimates rely on recursive right‐tailed unit root tests (each with a different recursive algorithm) that may be used in real time to locate the origination and collapse dates of bubbles. Under certain explicit conditions, the moving window detector of PSY is shown to be a consistent dating algorithm even in the presence of multiple bubbles. The other algorithms are consistent detectors for bubbles early in the sample and, under stronger conditions, for subsequent bubbles in some cases. These asymptotic results and accompanying simulations guide the practical implementation of the procedures. They indicate that the PSY moving window detector is more reliable than the PWY strategy, sequential application of the PWY procedure, and the CUSUM procedure.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7faa3226e4092d7a43a89a21b4440807180a4351
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Shuping Shi
- Peter C. B. Phillips
- S. Hurn
- David Martínez-Rego
- Carmine Ventre
- Leslie Kanthan
- Lingbo Li
- Fan Wu
Citations in the corpus
- Causal Change Detection in Possibly Integrated Systems: Revisiting the Money–Income Relationship* (2019, positive): “Our results are consistent with those of Thoma (1994) and Psaradakis et al. (2005) in the sense that there is, we believe, reliable evidence that money Granger causes output in the first part of the 1980s but not the second part.”
- Cryptocurrency trading: a comprehensive survey (2020, methodology): “[181, 182] (who applied a recursive augmented Dickey-Fuller algorithm, which is called PSY test) and Landsnes et al.”