To close the yield-gap while saving biodiversity will require multiple locally relevant strategies

By S. Cunningham, S. Attwood, K. Bawa, T. Benton, L. Broadhurst, Raphael K. Didham, S. McIntyre, I. Perfecto, M. Samways, T. Tscharntke and 4 more. 2013

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Increasing yield has emerged as the most prominent element in strategies to deal with growing global demand for food and fibre. It is usually acknowledged that this needs to be done while minimising harm to the environment, but historically land-use intensification has been a major driver of biodiversity loss. The risk is now great that a singular focus on increasing yields will divert attention from the linked problem of biodiversity decline, and the historical pattern will continue. There are options that increase yields while reducing harm to biodiversity, which should be the focus of future strategies. The solutions are not universal, but are locally specific. This is because landscapes vary greatly in inherent biodiversity, the production systems they can support, and the potential for them to be adopted by landholders. While new production techniques might apply at local scale, biodiversity conservation inevitably requires strategies at landscape and larger scales.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f8e6b625d206275fe8bc423736f7acfa524a783

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. D. Byerlee
  2. L. Marini
  3. Raphael K. Didham
  4. Paul C. Struik
  5. Nelson B. Villoria
  6. S. Wratten
  7. T. Kuyper
  8. R. Bommarco

Citations in the corpus