Food web quantification using secondary production analysis: predaceous invertebrates of the snag habitat in a subtropical river

By A. Benke, J. B. Wallace, James W. Harrison, J. Koebel. 2001

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f84f823437cf5c863f48b7186822fd227f9407c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. M. Pardal
2. M. Emmerson
3. Marina Dolbeth
4. P. C. Ruiter
5. J. M. Montoya
6. Ronaldo Sousa
7. Alan J. McKane
8. Joel E. Cohen

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. M. Montoya
2. J. Fox
3. P. C. Ruiter
4. Ronaldo Sousa
5. Alan J. McKane
6. Joel E. Cohen
7. B. Ebenman
8. Eric L Berlow

Citations in the corpus

• Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities (2004, background): “Biomass flux Absolute or relative Property of Common currency Does not measure either prey Benke et al. (2001) magnitude of biomass individual link Potentially can be derived or predator response Bersier et al.”
• Secondary production as a tool for better understanding of aquatic ecosystems (2012, methodology): “…Drake 1994, Ponti et al. 2007) Energy or materials flow (e.g.): - Food web quantification Food web quantification combining gut analysis with production (Benke et al. 2001); Analyses of top-down or bottom-up controls of the system (e.g. Hyrun 1998, Nyström et al. 2003); Ecopath models (Patrício…”