Trimming and Improving Skip-thought Vectors
By Shuai Tang, Hailin Jin, Chen Fang, Zhaowen Wang, Virginia de Sa. 2017
7 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The skip-thought model has been proven to be effective at learning sentence representations and capturing sentence semantics. In this paper, we propose a suite of techniques to trim and improve it. First, we validate a hypothesis that, given a current sentence, inferring the previous and inferring the next sentence provide similar supervision power, therefore only one decoder for predicting the next sentence is preserved in our trimmed skip-thought model. Second, we present a connection layer between encoder and decoder to help the model to generalize better on semantic relatedness tasks. Third, we found that a good word embedding initialization is also essential for learning better sentence representations. We train our model unsupervised on a large corpus with contiguous sentences, and then evaluate the trained model on 7 supervised tasks, which includes semantic relatedness, paraphrase detection, and text classification benchmarks. We empirically show that, our proposed model is a faster, lighter-weight and equally powerful alternative to the original skip-thought model.
Subfields: Natural Language Processing, Representation & Self-Supervised Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
- Yonatan Belinkov
- Samuel R. Bowman
- Alexis Conneau
- Graham Neubig
- Douwe Kiela
- Guillaume Lample
- Germán Kruszewski
- John Wieting
In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning
- Alexis Conneau
- Germán Kruszewski
- Guillaume Lample
- Marco Baroni
- Loïc Barrault
- John Wieting
- Douwe Kiela
- Sebastian Ruder
Citations in the corpus
- What you can cram into a single $&!#* vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic properties (2018, methodology): “We train SkipThought vectors (Kiros et al., 2015) by predicting the next sentence given the current one (Tang et al., 2017), on 30M sentences from the Toronto Book Corpus, excluding those in the probing sets.”