Using Phylogenetic Diversity Measures to Set Priorities in Conservation: an Example from Southern South America

By P. Posadas, D. R. M. Esquivel, J. Crisci. 2001

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f79218b63b1e7e8736701e48b8b7f77f324d989

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. C. Reid
2. Daniel P. Faith
3. Richard M. Cowling
4. P. Desmet
5. Jorge M. Lobo
6. Joaquín Hortal

Citations in the corpus

• Integrating Phylogenetic Diversity, Complementarity, and Endemism for Conservation Assessment (2004, background): “Posadas et al. (2001) do not consider PD but do examine a number of alternative “phylogenetic indices,” with or without modifications, to take “endemism” into account (the complexity introduced by these alternatives and variations requires a flow diagram; see their Fig.”