Review of guided-wave structural health monitoring

By Ajay Raghavan, C. E. Cesnik. 2007

1,073 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f719ecc6c4f7a81ba8f69e23465e67bd704d69f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

In Civil and Structural Engineering

In Mechanics of Materials

Citations in the corpus

Automated detection of delamination and disbond from wavefield images obtained using a scanning laser vibrometer (2011, neutral): “The most commonly used transducers include angled piezoelectric wedge transducers, comb transducers, electromagnetic acoustic transducers and surface-bonded piezoelectric wafer transducers [6–10].”
Complete noncontact laser ultrasonic imaging for automated crack visualization in a plate (2013, background): “In particular, ultrasonic based SHM techniques are garnering attention because ultrasonic waves are sensitive to even small defects and can travel a relatively long distance with little attenuation [1–6].”
A REVIEW PAPER ON LOOSENESS DETECTION METHODS IN BOLTED STRUCTURES (2017, background): “…their frequency range is dissimilar and they are often used to troubleshoot thinner structures (Rose, 1999; Meo & Amerini, 2011; Park, et al., 2015; Wang, et al., 2013; Joshi & Pathare, 1984; Alleyne & Cawley, 1992; Cawley & Alleyne, 1996; Cho, 2000; Raghavan & Cesnik, 2007; Park, et al., 2006).”
Electrical Impedance Tomographic Methods for Sensing Strain Fields and Crack Damage in Cementitious Structures (2009, background): “In structural elements whose geometry guides the stress wave in a specific direction, the ultrasonic stress waves are termed guided waves (Raghavan and Cesnik, 2007); some examples of guided wave techniques to characterize damage in concrete include Na et al.”
Acousto-ultrasonics-based fatigue damage characterization: Linear versus nonlinear signal features (2014, background): “a diversity of fashions, showing demonstrated compromise among resolution, detectability, practicality, and cost [5–12].”
Guided wave based structural health monitoring: A review (2016, methodology): “Several comprehensive reviews [19, 20] already exist in literature, however, those are mostly dated in the last decade.”
Feasibility of using digital image correlation for unmanned aerial vehicle structural health monitoring of bridges (2018, background): “A similar conclusion can be drawn for those methods that employ guided-waves which is more suitable for lab-scale investigations or for confined geometries.(34) With particular reference to bridge deck evaluation, ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has demonstrated its capability to be used for concrete”
Carbon Nanotube Sensing Skins for Spatial Strain and Impact Damage Identification (2009, background): “Moreover, application of guided-waves on complex structures generally requires a priori geometrical knowledge of the undamaged structure to distinguish structural features from detected damage [5], a problem that is exacerbated by temperature variations.”
Effects of Elevated Temperature on Guided-wave Structural Health Monitoring (2008, methodology): “More recently, extensions of these models to other structural configurations (isotropic beams, hollow cylinders, and composite plates) have also been proposed (Raghavan and Cesnik, 2007a,b).”