Full-Wave Invisibility of Active Devices at All Frequencies

By Allan Greenleaf, Yaroslav Kurylev, Matti Lassas, Gunther Uhlmann. 2006

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

There has recently been considerable interest in the possibility, both theoretical and practical, of invisibility (or “cloaking”) from observation by electromagnetic (EM) waves. Here, we prove invisibility with respect to solutions of the Helmholtz and Maxwell’s equations, for several constructions of cloaking devices. The basic idea, as in the papers [GLU2, GLU3, Le, PSS1], is to use a singular transformation that pushes isotropic electromagnetic parameters forward into singular, anisotropic ones. We define the notion of finite energy solutions of the Helmholtz and Maxwell’s equations for such singular electromagnetic parameters, and study the behavior of the solutions on the entire domain, including the cloaked region and its boundary. We show that, neglecting dispersion, the construction of [GLU3, PSS1] cloaks passive objects, i.e., those without internal currents, at all frequencies k. Due to the singularity of the metric, one needs to work with weak solutions. Analyzing the behavior of such solutions inside the cloaked region, we show that, depending on the chosen construction, there appear new “hidden” boundary conditions at the surface separating the cloaked and uncloaked regions. We also consider the effect on invisibility of active devices inside the cloaked region, interpreted as collections of sources and sinks or internal currents. When these conditions are overdetermined, as happens for Maxwell’s equations, generic internal currents prevent the existence of finite energy solutions and invisibility is compromised.We give two basic constructions for cloaking a region D contained in a domain $$\Omega\subset\mathbb R^n, n\ge 3$$ , from detection by measurements made at $$\partial\Omega$$ of Cauchy data of waves on Ω. These constructions, the single and double coatings, correspond to surrounding either just the outer boundary $$\partial D^+$$ of the cloaked region, or both $$\partial D^+$$ and $$\partial D^-$$ , with metamaterials whose EM material parameters (index of refraction or electric permittivity and magnetic permeability) are conformal to a singular Riemannian metric on Ω. For the single coating construction, invisibility holds for the Helmholtz equation, but fails for Maxwell’s equations with generic internal currents. However, invisibility can be restored by modifying the single coating construction, by either inserting a physical surface at $$\partial D^-$$ or using the double coating. When cloaking an infinite cylinder, invisibility results for Maxwell’s equations are valid if the coating material is lined on $$\partial D^-$$ with a surface satisfying the soft and hard surface (SHS) boundary condition, but in general not without such a lining, even for passive objects.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f2e1feecb5c1059b8e1063cf54f54f553ffcca7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Citations in the corpus

REGULARIZED D-BAR METHOD FOR THE INVERSE CONDUCTIVITY PROBLEM (2009, background): “These examples bridge Calderón’s inverse problem, invisibility cloaking, and transformation optics [27, 28, 32].”
Acoustic cloaking theory (2008, background): “[16] that the scalar wave equation is mapped into the following form in the deformed cloak region”