On the simultaneity problem in the aid and growth debate

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Malthus living in a slum: Urban concentration, infrastructures and economic growth (2017, unknown): “However, as shown by Wooldridge (2010, p. 125) and noted by Brückner (2013), in the special case of testing that slope coefficients are equal to zero these standard errors are correct.”
Aid and Growth at the Regional Level (2015, unknown): “Second, we purge aid of those parts that are endogenous to growth, using data on rainfall growth and its square in the spirit of Brückner (2013). However, our instruments are too weak to allow us to draw any strong conclusions.”
The effect of aid on growth: evidence from a Quasi-experiment (2014, unknown): “Clemens et al. 2012; Bruckner 2013), and conclude that “the large majority…have found positive impacts,” particularly when effects are assessed over longer time periods.”
Does foreign aid harm political institutions (2015, methodology): “Applying different methods and data, they find a positive and statistically significant effect of aid when considered over the long-run (Arndt et al., 2015a, 2010; Juselius et al., 2014; Brückner, 2013; Clemens et al., 2012; Minoiu and Reddy, 2010).”
Economic growth, size of the agricultural sector, and urbanization in Africa (2011, unknown): “7 See for example Deaton (1999), Miguel et al.”