Modelling community dynamics based on species‐level abundance models from detection/nondetection data

By Y. Yamaura, J. Andrew Royle, K. Kuboi, T. Tada, Susumu Ikeno, S. Makino. 2011

82 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Towards good practice guidance in using camera‐traps in ecology: influence of sampling design on validity of ecological inferences (2013, methodology): “While many analytical methods require individuals to be identified, methods have recently been developed for cases where individual identification is difficult or even impossible (Royle & Nichols 2003; MacKenzie, Bailey & Nichols 2004; Rowcliffe et al. 2008; Yamaura et al. 2011).”
Modelling of species distributions, range dynamics and communities under imperfect detection: advances, challenges and opportunities (2017, background): “Hierarchical models of abundance extend to describe dynamics (e.g. by fitting a simple trend, Kéry et al. 2009a; or through more elaborate spatiotemporal modelling, e.g. Hooten et al. 2007) and to the community setting (Yamaura et al. 2011, Yamaura et al. 2012, Dorazio et al. 2015).”
Estimating mammalian species richness and occupancy in tropical forest canopies with arboreal camera traps (2017, methodology): “Occupancy was modelled using a multi-species version of the Royle–Nichols (RN) occupancy model (Royle and Nichols 2003; Yamaura et al. 2011; Tobler et al. 2015).”