Inhibition-Related ERP Components: Variation with Modality, Age, and Time-on-Task

By Michael Falkenstein, J. Hoormann, J. Hohnsbein. 2002

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. (2013, methodology): “Hence, whereas the frontalmidline P300 observed during response inhibition tasks seems to be relatively unaffected by stimulus modality (Tekok-Kilic et al., 2001; Falkenstein et al., 2002), some have hypothesized that the N200 response ismodality specific (e.g., Falkenstein et al., 1999).”
Development of Inhibitory Processing During the Go/NoGo Task: A Behavioral and Event-Related Potenti (2005, background): “N2 was larger in response to NoGo than Go stimuli, indicating a successful task manipulation, and providing support for the previous link between this component and aspects of inhibitory processing (Falkenstein et al., 2002; Jodo & Kayama, 1992; Kok, 1986; Overtoom et al., 1998; Pfefferbaum & Ford, ”