Induced systemic resistance (ISR) against pathogens in the context of induced plant defences.

By Martin Heil, R. Bostock. Annals of Botany, 2002

615 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f10caea76a83566b1ff8cd3d5b4e7e333f0ebad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

1. N. V. van Dam
2. Martin Heil
3. D. Ballhorn
4. S. Kautz
5. N. Stamp
6. U. Lion
7. C. Ryu
8. B. Mauch-Mani

In Plant Science

1. J. Kloepper
2. C. Ryu
3. Martin Heil
4. N. V. van Dam
5. Prof. (Dr.) Baljeet Singh Saharan
6. V. Nehra
7. M. Reddy
8. V. Pastor

Citations in the corpus

• Impact of chemical elicitor applications on greenhouse tomato plants and population growth of the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (2006, background): “BTH brings about responses normally associated with plant pathogens (Lamb & Dixon, 1997; van Loon, 1997), conferring resistance throughout the plant to a broad range of fungal, bacterial, and viral pathogens in a phenomenon known as systemic acquired resistance (SAR) (Heil & Bostock, 2002).”
• Plant Responses to Simultaneous Biotic and Abiotic Stress: Molecular Mechanisms (2014, background): “disruption in plant metabolism implying physiological costs [1–4], and thus leading to a reduction in fitness and ultimately in productivity [5].”
• Multitrophic interactions below and above ground: en route to the next level (2011, background): “This situation commonly leads to a trade-off, that is, an impaired capacity of a plant to respond to insect damage when the SA-signalling pathway is already active or vice versa (Heil & Bostock 2002; Thaler, Fidantsef & Bostock 2002; Bostock 2005).”
• Antibiotic resistance plasmids in wastewater treatment plants and their possible dissemination into the environment (2010, background): “Elicited by local infection, plants respond with a salicylic-dependent signaling cascade that leads to systemic expression of a broad spectrum and long-lasting disease resistance that is efficient against fungi, bacteria and viruses (Heil and Bostock, 2002).”
• Exploring the Temperature-Stress Metabolome of Arabidopsis1[w] (2004, background): “Vol. 136, 2004 4163 level of resistance to pathogens in plants (Heil and Bostock, 2002).”
• Comparative performance of formulations of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in growth promotion and suppression of downy mildew in pearl millet (2003, background): “This response is activated upon inducement with appropriate biotic and abiotic agents, and is termed systemic acquired resistance (SAR) (Heil and Bostock, 2002).”
• Bioprospecting and antifungal potential of chitinolytic microorganisms (2006, background): “This response involves production of many pathogenesis related proteins (PR-proteins) which mainly include (a) phenol oxidases, peroxidases and polyphenoloxidases (Nicholson and Hammerschmidt, 1992; Wojtaszek, 1997) and (b) enzymes like -1,3 glucanases, chitinases, -1,4 glucosidases and Nacetlygluco”
• The molecular bases of plant resistance and defense responses to aphid feeding: current status (2007, background): “The involvement of ROS in pathogen resistance is well known (Heil & Bostock, 2002), and these compounds may also have direct adverse affects on arthropod midgut tissues.”
• Out Of The Quagmire Of Plant Defense Hypotheses (2003, background): “For some plants in response to some enemies, the inducible defense pathways may be separate and for others there may be some “cross-talk” among pathways (Agrawal and Karban 1999; Felton and Korth 2000; Heil and Bostock 2002; Kunkel and Brooks 2002).”