Income Distribution and Development

By Ravi Kanbur. 2000

447 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f0753ebf2449a9db5a71a471a3c08ee733489ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Technological change, rent and income inequalities: A Schumpeterian approach (2017, background): “The inverted U-shaped relationship between the stage of development and inequality finds only partial support and seems to be quite sensitive to the composition of the datasets and the time periods analysed (Adelman and Robinson, 1989; Atkinson and Piketty, 2007 and 2009).”
Industrial development and economic growth Implications for poverty reduction and income inequality (2002, background): “In addition, due to improvements in education, the supply of higher educated workers was relatively high, which decreased marginal returns to education (Chu 1995, Kanbur 2000).”
Inequality in China – Trends, Drivers and Policy Remedies (2018, background): “However, it needs to be noted that the existing evidence on the Kuznets hypothesis is, at best, inconclusive (Barro 2008; Kanbur, 2000; Cornia et al., 2004, and references therein).”
The Earnings Effects of Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Implications for Poverty in Developing Countries (2003, methodology): “Therefore, we echo Kanbur’s (2000) call for disaggregated analysis of poverty impacts.”
GROWTH, INEQUALITY AND POVERTY: SOME HARD QUESTIONS (2004, background): “But there is a second level of hard (harder) questions that may not be quite so amenable to 9 Some papers are reviewed in Kanbur (2000) and Kanbur and Lustig (2000).”
The New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD): An initial commentary (2002, background): “* Ravi Kanbur is the T.H. Lee Professor of World Affairs and Professor of Economics, Cornell University.”
Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries (2000, background): “On an empirical level, the Kuznets curve was accepted through the 1970s as a strong empirical regularity (see especially Ahluwalia, 1976a, 1976b). Papanek and Kyn (1986) find that the Kuznets relation is statistically significant but explains little of the variations in inequality across countries o”
CAN WE DISCERN THE EFFECT OF GLOBALIZATION ON INCOME DISTRIBUTION? Evidence from Household Budget Surveys (2003, background): “As Wood (1994) writes, a strategy based on exports of manufactures that require at least basic education would be equitable in Korea but inequitable in Burkina Faso or Pakistan (quoted from Kanbur, 1998).”
Growth, Income Distribution, and Poverty: A Review (2001, background): “10 education, and social capital, as well as safety nets to protect the poor; improved access to capital through better functioning credit markets, and a more equal distribution of assets (Stewart, 2000, Thorbecke, 1999; Asian Development Bank, 1999; World Bank, 1999, Goudie and Ladd, 1999).”
Agglomeration, inequality and economic growth (2014, background): “the change in inequality, not only the level of inequality, which matters (Adelman and Robinson 1989; Chen 2003; Banerjee and Duflo 2003).”
Has Globalisation Increased Inequality (2008, unknown): “See Kanbur (2000) and Attanasio et al. (2004).”