Guiding ecological principles for marine spatial planning
By M. Foley, B. Halpern, Fiorenza Micheli, Matthew H. Armsby, M. Caldwell, Caitlin MULLAN CRAIN, Erin Prahler, Deborah A. Sivas. 2010
586 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7efdadfc4c517da9f97c7df6de5275f5d5ab8efc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. Chaloupka
- Jeffrey A. Seminoff
- K. Bjorndal
- Sebastian Tröeng
- A. Bolten
- Bryan P. Wallace
- P. Casale
- P. Dutton
Citations in the corpus
- Benthos distribution modelling and its relevance for marine ecosystem management (2015, methodology): “…and more explicit lists can be found in advanced subject-specific text books (e.g. Legendre and Legendre, 1998; Zuur et al., 2012), reviews, and objectspecific comparative research papers (e.g. Guisan and Zimmermann, 2000; Guisan and Thuiller, 2005; Franklin, 2010; Robinson et al., 2011).”
- Dynamic ensemble models to predict distributions and anthropogenic risk exposure for highly mobile species (2019, background): “Marine spatial planning implicitly addresses such trade‐offs and as such has become a valuable approach for regulating multiple ocean activities while achieving conservation targets (Foley et al., 2010; White, Halpern, & Kappel, 2012).”
- Effects of ocean sprawl on ecological connectivity: impacts and solutions (2017, background): “Spatially explicit consideration of the multiple human uses in the marine and estuarine systems are critical to support current and future uses of the ocean andmaintain the delivery of valuable ecosystem services (Foley et al., 2010), which is dependent, among other things, on the connectivity of or”
- Mapping ecosystem services provided by benthic habitats in the European North Atlantic Ocean (2014, background): “…there is a key goal of maintaining the delivery of ecosystem services, which must be based upon ecological principles that articulate the scientifically-recognized attributes of healthy functioning ecosystems (Foley et al., 2010), as required by the MSFD (Borja et al., 2013; Tett et al., 2013).”
- Regional Management Units for Marine Turtles: A Novel Framework for Prioritizing Conservation and Research across Multiple Scales (2010, background): “To optimize ecosystem function, especially in areas where multiple activities by multiple nations occur, ecosystem-based marine management approaches should be designed to preserve marine biodiversity, keystone species, and biological connectivity among marine habitats [1,53].”
- Ecosystem-based marine spatial management: Review of concepts, policies, tools, and critical issues (2011, background): “Evidence-based feedback (Day, 2008) is crucial to the achievement of the objectives of any adaptive management framework (Blæsbjerg et al., 2009; Ekebom et al., 2008; Foley et al., 2010; Grafton and Kompas, 2005; Pomeroy et al., 2005; Walters and Hilborn, 1976), as it provides important output from ”
- Framework for understanding marine ecosystem health (2013, background): “One strategy is to seek consensus amongst a group of experts (e.g. Foley et al. 2010).”
- Evolving coral reef conservation with genetic information (2014, background): “…al. 2011), and replication (Green et al. 2009). refinements of general design principles may include specific threats such as climate change (Fernandes et al. 2012), or predicted states such as risk level, persistence probabilities or information uncertainty (Game et al. 2008, Foley et al. 2010).”