Power Characterization of Isolated Bidirectional Dual-Active-Bridge DC–DC Converter With Dual-Phase-Shift Control

By Biao Zhao, Qiang Song, Wenhua Liu. IEEE transactions on power electronics, 2012

355 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Unified Triple-Phase-Shift Control to Minimize Current Stress and Achieve Full Soft-Switching of Isolated Bidirectional DC–DC Converter (2016, neutral): “[15] and [16].”
Overview and Comparison of Modulation and Control Strategies for a Nonresonant Single-Phase Dual-Active-Bridge DC–DC Converter (2020, background): “These expressions can be derived from the articles of the NSDAB dc–dc converter [31], [33], [39], [48].”
Novel Dual-Phase-Shift Control With Bidirectional Inner Phase Shifts for a Dual-Active-Bridge Converter Having Low Surge Current and Stable Power Control (2017, background): “In [20], it is reported that unity power factor and high efficiency can be obtained by carefully choosing the combination of the inner and outer phase shift ratios.”
A Single-Stage Dual-Active-Bridge-Based Soft Switched AC–DC Converter With Open-Loop Power Factor Correction and Other Advanced Features (2014, background): “TPZM where both the bridges have the same duty cycle [25], [26].”
Topologies and Control Schemes of Bidirectional DC–DC Power Converters: An Overview (2019, background): “The dead-band effect is also easier to compensate in DPS control than in SPS control and with the same outer phase-shift ratio D2, the DPS control can offer wider power transmission range than the SPS control [112].”