Ranging Behavior of Proboscis Monkeys (Nasalis larvatus) in the Lower Kinabatangan, Northern Borneo

By R. Boonratana. International journal of primatology, 2000

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7eead68b95da49f757d72cfc142a978d4d84cd0a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. Peter J. Fashing
2. Ikki Matsuda
3. S. Higashi
4. V. Nijman
5. A. Tuuga
6. T. Harris

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. H. Bernard
2. Peter J. Fashing
3. Ikki Matsuda
4. S. Higashi
5. V. Nijman
6. A. Tuuga
7. T. Harris

In Social Psychology

1. Benoit Goossens
2. Peter J. Fashing
3. Ikki Matsuda
4. S. Higashi
5. V. Nijman
6. A. Tuuga
7. T. Harris

Citations in the corpus

• Status and Conservation of Proboscis Monkeys (Nasalis larvatus) in Sabah, East Malaysia (2008, background): “Proboscis monkeys are closely associated with waterways, traveling inland to forage (generally up to 1 km) and returning to their sleeping sites along the river edge every evening (Bennett 1988; Bennett and Sebastian 1988; Yeager 1989; Boonratana 2000; Matsuda 2008).”
• Activity and Ranging Patterns of Guerezas in the Kakamega Forest: Intergroup Variation and Implications for Intragroup Feeding Competition (2001, background): “…behavior of colobine monkeys has been studied extensively at many locations, e.g. by Struhsaker (1974), Oates (1977), Marsh (1981), McKey and Waterman (1982), Bennett (1986), Olson (1986), Stanford (1991), Bocian (1997), Kirkpatrick et al. (1998), Fleury et al. (1999), and Boonratana (2000).”
• Ranging Behavior of Proboscis Monkeys in a Riverine Forest with Special Reference to Ranging in Inland Forest (2009, methodology): “Boonratana (2000), using a much smaller sample (53 sampling days) than we did (161 days), did not find a correlation between the daily path length of proboscis monkeys and the amount of rainfall, whereas we found a significant correlation.”
• Modeling population viability of local proboscis monkey Nasalis larvatus populations: conservation implications (2012, background): “Proboscis monkeys Nasalis larvatus live in either stable 1-male groups or all-male groups (Bennett & Sebastian 1988, Yeager 1990, Boonratana 2000).”
• Effects of water level on sleeping-site selection and inter-group association in proboscis monkeys: why do they sleep alone inland on flooded days? (2010, background): “Ranging of proboscis monkeys is influenced by the availability of fruits, despite their main food being young leaves that are equally distributed in the forests (Boonratana 2000; Matsuda et al. 2009a).”