The principles of rapid response for amphibian conservation, using the programmes in Panama as an example

By Ron Gagliardo, Paul S Crump, Edgardo J. Griffith, Joseph Mendelson, Heidi Ross, K. Zippel. 2008

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Decline and extirpation of an endangered Panamanian stream frog population (Craugastor punctariolus) due to an outbreak of chytridiomycosis (2008, background): “Mark-recapture parameter estimates such as these may provide more power to detect declines and conduct sensitivity analysis (Funk et al., 2003), and may instigate conservation actions (e.g. Gagliardo et al., 2008 ).”
The effect of captivity on the cutaneous bacterial community of the critically endangered Panamanian golden frog (Atelopus zeteki) (2014, background): “For many threatened species, captivity is the only tool available to conservation managers to prevent extinction when survival in the organism’s native habitat is not possible, as is the case with the Panamanian golden frog, Atelopus zeteki (Gagliardo et al., 2008).”
The Genome 10K Project: A Way Forward (2015, unknown): “begin soon on the last of the nine amphibian G10K species, including the horned marsupial frog (Gastrotheca cornuta), with its unusual reproductive biology and high conservation concern (75).”