Objective Function Learning to Match Human Judgements for Optimization-Based Summarization

By Maxime Peyrard, Iryna Gurevych. 2018

20 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Supervised summarization systems usually rely on supervision at the sentence or n-gram level provided by automatic metrics like ROUGE, which act as noisy proxies for human judgments. In this work, we learn a summary-level scoring function \theta including human judgments as supervision and automatically generated data as regularization. We extract summaries with a genetic algorithm using \theta as a fitness function. We observe strong and promising performances across datasets in both automatic and manual evaluation.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Optimization & Training

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Yejin Choi
  2. Mohit Bansal
  3. Iryna Gurevych
  4. Ronan Le Bras
  5. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  6. Noah A. Smith
  7. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  8. Jianfeng Gao

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Yejin Choi
  2. Iryna Gurevych
  3. Mohit Bansal
  4. Ronan Le Bras
  5. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  6. Noah A. Smith
  7. Yang Gao
  8. Andreas Vlachos

In Optimization & Training

  1. Maxime Peyrard
  2. Yang Gao
  3. Christian M. Meyer
  4. Iryna Gurevych
  5. Ari Holtzman
  6. Yejin Choi
  7. Andreas Vlachos
  8. Jack Hessel

Citations in the corpus