But they all come back: Rethinking prisoner reentry

By J. Travis. 2000

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ed6f32fbc8eb441b900e549fccb7ad274806450

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Thomas P. Lebel
2. M. Berg
3. M. Delisi
4. Shadd Maruna
5. Matt Richie
6. S. Belenko
7. Silke Meyer
8. Joshua C. Cochran

Citations in the corpus

• Assessing Released Inmates for Substance-Abuse-Related Service Needs (2006, background): “Rates of technical violations of parole conditions are high (Beck & Mumola, 1999; Langan & Levin, 2002; Petersilia, 2001; Travis, 2000).”
• The correctional melting pot: Race, ethnicity, citizenship, and prison violence (2006, background): “Most inmates are short-term prisoners (Hughes & Wilson, 2004; Travis, 2000), thus communities affected by concentrated incarceration also experience disproportionately high numbers of ex-convicts returning to the community.”
• Helping Others as a Response to Reconcile a Criminal Past (2015, background): “In what Bazemore (1999) calls “earned redemption,” strengths-based practices treat offenders as community assets to be utilized “rather than merely liabilities to be supervised” (Travis, 2000, p. 7).”