Using ecoacoustic methods to survey the impacts of climate change on biodiversity

By B. Krause, Almo Farina. 2016

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ecb37cb7eb1a7d834fe0974da4207b890f72902

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. Toby Gifford
2. Simon Linke
3. C. Desjonquères

In Ecology

1. Toby Gifford
2. Simon Linke
3. P. Guidetti
4. C. Desjonquères

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. P. Guidetti

Citations in the corpus

• Acoustic fish communities: sound diversity of rocky habitats reflects fish species diversity (2019, background): “In the last decades, passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) has been proposed as a potential non-intrusive and non-destructive approach to study changes in richness and diversity of natural communities of species in the terrestrial and aquatic realms (Krause & Farina 2016).”
• Passive acoustic monitoring as a potential tool to survey animal and ecosystem processes in freshwater environments (2019, background): “Such regular surveys can produce time series revealing the short‐term effects of global changes (Krause & Farina, 2016).”