Determination of plastic properties of metals by instrumented indentation using different sharp indenters

By J. Bucaille, S. Stauss, E. Felder, J. Michler. 2003

567 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the uniqueness of measuring elastoplastic properties from indentation: The indistinguishable mystical materials (2007, methodology): “Other variants of a are also commonly used in the indentation analyses (Futakawa et al., 2001; Bucaille et al., 2003; Chollacoop et al., 2003; DiCarlo et al., 2003; Cao and Lu, 2004a; Ogasawara et al., 2005), such as a 1⁄4 60 (Rockwell tip), a 1⁄4 63:14 (the cross-sectional area is half of that of t”
Fast identification of poroelastic parameters from indentation tests (2009, background): “…means which allows for extraction of much information from indentation results, for example the elastoplastic stress-strain curve of a metal (Bucaille et al., 2003), the matrix flow-stress in a composite (Bucaille et al, 2004), and the poroelastic, viscoelastic or poroviscoelastic…”
Extraction of mechanical properties of materials through deep learning from instrumented indentation (2020, methodology): “Traditionally, algorithms based on conical indentation finite element results were used for obtaining approximate solutions of Vickers or Berkovich 3D indentation problems (5, 6, 9, 18 – 20).”