Evolution and the human mind: Contents
By Peter Carruthers, A. Chamberlain. 2000
143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ec8136a46ce92edfa87c14dec211cf530ba1de8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cultural Studies
- Stephen Stich
- T. Wharton
- Stephen Laurence
- Mark Schaller
- Bertram F. Malle
- Peter Carruthers
- Deirdre Wilson
- K. Stanovich
In Sociology and Political Science
- Mark Schaller
- Bertram F. Malle
- T. Wharton
- Peter Carruthers
- Stephen Laurence
- Deirdre Wilson
- Stephen Stich
- Tim Miller
Citations in the corpus
- The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents (2005, background): “There is also much healthy disagreement over the exact nature of the innate faculties and mechanisms that have evolved (Carruthers & Chamberlain, 2000; Heyes & Huber, 2000).”
- Parasites, Behavioral Defenses, and the Social Psychological Mechanisms Through Which Cultures Are Evoked (2006, background): “The remarkable developmental plasticity and cross-domain integration of some cognitive mechanisms may be products of selection for special sensitivity to variable social context (e.g., Boyer, 1998; Carruthers, 2002; Sperber & Hirschfeld, 2004).”
- The relation between language and theory of mind in development and evolution (2002, background): “And indeed, several authors maintain that having the ability to infer others’ communicative intentions is a precondition for language (e.g., Origgi & Sperber, 2000; Sperber, forthcoming).”
- Relevance and prosody (2006, background): “The main distinction between signs and signals is one of function (in the sense of Millikan 1984; Sperber 2000a, forthcoming a; Origgi and Sperber 2000).”