Progress Towards Metal Additive Manufacturing Standardization to Support Qualification and Certification

By M. Seifi, M. Gorelik, J. Waller, Nikolas Hrabe, Nima Shamsaei, S. Daniewicz, J. Lewandowski. 2017

365 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7ea18a5fa7318b71e984560498d06c131a06e27f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. A. Fatemi
2. A. du Plessis
3. N. Sanaei
4. I. Yadroitsava
5. I. Yadroitsev
6. N. Phan
7. R. Molaei
8. Nima Shamsaei

In Mechanical Engineering

1. A. Fatemi
2. A. du Plessis
3. N. Sanaei
4. I. Yadroitsava
5. N. Phan
6. I. Yadroitsev
7. R. Molaei
8. Nima Shamsaei

Citations in the corpus

• Review: The Impact of Metal Additive Manufacturing on the Aerospace Industry (2019, background): “[26,27] have focused their efforts on developing standards to support the qualification and certification of metal AM, especially with regard to the aspects of materials, microstructures, and mechanical properties.”
• The barriers to the progression of additive manufacture: perspectives from UK industry (2018, background): “The deficit in AM standards has only recently begun to be rectified (ASTM International, 2017; Seifi et al., 2017).”
• Effects of defects on mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing: A review focusing on X-ray tomography insights (2020, background): “The use of X-ray tomography for inspection and qualification of additively manufactured parts was discussed in detail in [55,56] and the need for more detailed “effect of defect studies” was highlighted in these papers.”
• X-Ray Microcomputed Tomography in Additive Manufacturing: A Review of the Current Technology and Applications (2018, neutral): “…angles, supports, or lack of support—such a disparity between witness specimen and actual part is demonstrated in figure 3 in a study by Seifi et al. 97 Nevertheless, the use of witness specimens reduces the dependence and heavy time investment on image quality of the whole part and provides the…”
• Review of Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing for Metals (2021, background): “Qualification and standardization are other major issues which need to be considered to fabricate industrial products [37].”
• Advances in Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review of Common Processes, Industrial Applications, and Current Challenges (2021, background): “Indeed, the material properties do not remain the same after production; and material behaviour changes under cyclic thermal loading conditions [125].”
• Fatigue of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V, Part II: The relationship between microstructure, material cyclic properties, and component performance (2020, background): “Mechanical properties collected from small laboratory specimens might not fully represent the actual behavior of a part made of the same material [28,29].”