Mobility helps security in ad hoc networks

By Srdjan Čapkun, Jean-Pierre Hubaux, Levente Buttyán. ACM Interational Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, 2003

297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e9d7c63809f65627106275418a7894856d801cb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Citations in the corpus

A message ferrying approach for data delivery in sparse mobile ad hoc networks (2004, background): “There is also other work on exploiting mobility for security [7], location [14] and routing [10, 32].”
Multiple Controlled Mobile Elements (Data Mules) for Data Collection in Sensor Networks (2005, background): “In addition to increasing the lifetime of the system (by avoiding multi-hop communication), mobility has been shown to increase capacity [13], [14], help in calibration [15], [16], and assist in security [17].”
Seeing-is-believing: using camera phones for human-verifiable authentication (2005, background): “ˇ Capkun, Hubaux, and Buttyán have further extended this research direction [48].”
Secure routing for mobile ad hoc networks (2005, background): “Furthermore, the authors assume that trust between participating entities is transitive, that is if A trusts B then B must trust A, which is not always a valid assumption [52].”
URSA: ubiquitous and robust access control for mobile ad hoc networks (2004, background): “There are a few recent studies of secure communication [7] and cooperation stimulation [5] for mobile ad hoc networks.”
On Data-Centric Trust Establishment in Ephemeral Ad Hoc Networks (2008, unknown): “In [3], Capkun et.”
MOCA : MObile Certificate Authority for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks (2004, unknown): “[14], which is later extended in [3].”
On trust models and trust evaluation metrics for ad hoc networks (2006, background): “Alternatively, two users may come in close contact and visually identify each other, or exchange public keys, as suggested in [15].”
SECTOR: secure tracking of node encounters in multi-hop wireless networks (2003, methodology): “In the third approach, the root of the pending hash chain is disseminated in an authentic way by the mobility-based scheme we proposed in [8].”
A survey on peer-to-peer key management for mobile ad hoc networks (2007, methodology): “Protocol 2 [Capkun et al. 2003a, 2006] presented below explains Mechanism (c2) in more detail: Protocol 2 : Mechanism (c2) msg1 u . v: f, ru msg2 v . u: g, rv msg3 msg4 msg3l msg4l u . g: g . v: v . f : f . u: u, v: u, {du.g , request, v, ku, rv}kug g, {d g.v, reply, u, ku, rv}kvg v, {dv. f ,…”