Animal social network inference and permutations for ecologists in R using asnipe
By Damien Farine. 2013
340 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e99e6d536d2c61f8a4abf2393376007e93b40b0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Citations in the corpus
- Trends and perspectives on the use of animal social network analysis in behavioural ecology: a bibliometric approach (2019, methodology): “Until the advent of open access software and relatively easy-to-use social network R packages (e.g. Cs ardi & Nepusz, 2006; Farine, 2013, 2014), our findings suggest the social network subdiscipline went through some degree of methodological disarray.”
- Environment modulates population social structure: Experimental evidence from replicated social networks of wild lizards (2016, methodology): “Binary networks were created using the package asnipe (Farine, 2013) in R (R Core Team, 2013), with association matrices defining an edge between nodes if two individuals were observed in direct contact at least once during the week.”
- Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis (2015, background): “This involves keeping different aspects of the data constant in each model to identify whether they affect social structure (Farine 2013b).”
- A guide to null models for animal social network analysis (2017, methodology): “For this paper (and elsewhere, e.g. Farine 2013; Boogert, Farine & Spencer 2014; Farine & Whitehead 2015), I have found that linear or mixedmodels are useful for extracting test statistics when comparing among nodes in a network.”