On the classification problem for nuclear C^*-algebras

By Andrew S. Toms. 2005

211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We exhibit a counterexample to Elliott’s classification conjecture for simple, separable, and nuclear C ∗ -algebras whose construction is elementary, and demonstrate the necessity of extremely fine invariants in distinguishing both approximate unitary equivalence classes of automorphisms of such algebras and isomorphism classes of the algebras themselves. The consequences for the program to classify nuclear C ∗ -algebras are far-reaching: one has, among other things, that existing results on the classification of simple, unital AH algebras via the Elliott invariant of K-theoretic data are the best possible, and that these cannot be improved by the addition of continuous homotopy invariant functors to the Elliott invariant.

Subfields: Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e97e8fc0c63d7c876684430ea301a8fbde652e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Algebra and Number Theory

  1. W. Winter
  2. Andrew S. Toms
  3. G. Elliott
  4. Stuart White
  5. Yasuhiko Sato
  6. Z. Niu
  7. Aaron Tikuisis
  8. Huaxin Lin

In Mathematical Physics

  1. W. Winter
  2. Andrew S. Toms
  3. Yasuhiko Sato
  4. Stuart White
  5. G. Elliott
  6. G'abor Szab'o
  7. Z. Niu
  8. Aaron Tikuisis

Citations in the corpus