Benchmarking and incentive regulation of quality of service: an application to the UK electricity distribution networks

By Dimitrios Giannakis, Tooraj Jamasb, Michael Pollitt. 2005

283 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e926967e2547187bbd04058890b82cf48f83aed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. A. B. Haney
2. Michael Pollitt
3. P. Joskow
4. Tooraj Jamasb
5. Massimo Filippini

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. A. B. Haney
2. Michael Pollitt
3. P. Joskow
4. Tooraj Jamasb

In Strategy and Management

1. A. B. Haney
2. Michael Pollitt
3. P. Joskow

Citations in the corpus

• Infrastructure transformation as a socio-technical process — Implications for the governance of energy distribution networks in the UK (2015, unknown): “argue that the strong downward pressure on OPEX ‘may provide firms with distorted incentives that lead them to adopt an inefficient output mix’ because companies have been able to benefit to a greater degree from OPEX rather than CAPEX efficiencies [41].”
• Efficiency analysis of energy networks: An international survey of regulators (2009, methodology): “…techniques used; for example with DEA they can be accounted for by performing a second stage regression analysis of the efficiency scores (Giannakis et al., 2005; Yu et al., 2008) Benchmarking should not be confined to one particular technique; instead regulators should make use of a…”