Fiscal redistribution in the developed countries: new insights from the Luxembourg Income Study

By V. Mahler, David K. Jesuit. 2006

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e8e552a3138cca7dcab9ef915e9119a4b9c0178

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

The Nordic Model. Embracing globalization and sharing risks (2007, background): “While income inequality is rather similar in most countries before taxes and transfers (see Mahler and Jesuit (2006)), income inequality after redistribution via taxes and cash benefits differs considerably, and would most probably differ even more if Social welfare and equality are diffi cult to me”
Microsimulation and policy analysis (2014, methodology): “For example, Mahler and Jesuit (2006) and Wang et al. (2012) use household survey data from the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) to analyse redistributive effects in the OECD countries and Fuest et al. (2010) and Atta-Darkua and Barnard (2010) use the SILC data for EU countries.”
Taxation and the worlds of welfare (2009, methodology): “…the German case, again, shows that a very progressive income tax can be combined with heavy reliance on consumption and payroll tax to lead to overall regressivity.4 Mahler and Jesuit (2006) have used LIS data to analyze tax concentrations as part of their analysis of ‘fiscal redistribution’.”
Electoral turnout and income redistribution by the state: A cross-national analysis of the developed democracies (2008, methodology): “…calculated from LIS micro-data and measure a number of aspects of government redistribution in 13 developed countries for multiple years between 1979 and 2000—59 country-years in all.2 They are available from Mahler and Jesuit (2006a) and are described in more detail in Mahler and Jesuit (2006b).”
Pension system reform in China: Who gets what pensions? (2018, background): “Some empirical research demonstrated a positive effect of pensions on reducing income gaps (Caminada & Goudswaard, 2005; Kenworthy & Pontusson, 2005; Mahler & Jesuit, 2006).”
Welfare regimes and welfare state outcomes in Europe (2012, background): “A comprehensive disaggregation of redistributive effects by tax and transfer instruments and additionally disaggregation by the size and target efficiency of fiscal policies is offered by Mahler and Jesuit (2006).”