Do Earnings Reported Under IFRS Tell Us More About Future Earnings and Cash Flows
By T. Atwood, Michael S. Drake, James N. Myers, Linda A. Myers. 2011
181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e7ed92a45f7c11d97fd321021bce6eccfcc5ff1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Christian Leuz
- Hans B. Christensen
- Luzi Hail
- Peter D. Wysocki
- Ray Ball
- L. Doukakis
- Mark H. Lang
- Mark Maffett
In Strategy and Management
- Luzi Hail
- Christian Leuz
- Hans B. Christensen
- Peter D. Wysocki
- Ray Ball
- Holger Daske
- L. Doukakis
- Martin Glaum
Citations in the corpus
- Mandatory IFRS Reporting and Changes in Enforcement (2013, background): “, 2012), while others find no or the opposite effects (e.g., Christensen et al., 2008; Atwood et al., 2011; Capkun et al., 2011; Ahmed et al., 2013).”
- Intended and Unintended Consequences of Mandatory IFRS Adoption: A Review of Extant Evidence and Suggestions for Future Research (2013, unknown): “Studies analysing common earnings properties such as earnings smoothing, conditional conservatism or discretionary accruals find that mandatory IFRS adoption either has no significant impact (Atwood et al., 2011) or even a negative effect (Ahmed et al.”
- What drives the comparability effect of mandatory IFRS adoption? (2014, unknown): “…IFRS adoption primarily investigates only one of the two first-order effects, namely, changes in financial reporting quality (see Ahmed et al. 2013, Atwood et al. 2011, Landsman et al. 2011), as well as second-order capital-market consequences1 (see Beneish et al. 2012; Daske et al. 2008; Horton…”