Rounding Methods for Discrete Linear Classification
By Yann Chevaleyre, Frédéric Koriche, Jean-Daniel Zucker. 2013
24 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Optimization & Training, Statistical Learning Theory
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Optimization & Training
- Cynthia Rudin
- Berk Ustun
- Dolores Romero Morales
- Emilio Carrizosa
- Amaya Nogales-Gómez
- Nataliya Sokolovska
- Jean-Daniel Zucker
- Yann Chevaleyre
In Statistical Learning Theory
- Berk Ustun
- Cynthia Rudin
- Tong Wang
- Nataliya Sokolovska
- Jean-Daniel Zucker
- Yann Chevaleyre
- Finale Doshi-Velez
- Chudi Zhong
Citations in the corpus
- Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challenges (2021, background): “[60] propose randomized rounding, where non-integers are rounded up or”
- Learning Optimized Risk Scores (2016, background): “[28] Chevaleyre, Yann, Frederic Koriche, and Jean-Daniel Zucker.”
- Strongly agree or strongly disagree?: Rating features in Support Vector Machines (2016, methodology): “…agreement with a statement, (Keeney and Gregory 2005), and by linear classi ers in which the weights are allowed to take values on a discrete set, (Chevaleyre et al. 2013, Golea and Marchand 1993), we propose the Discrete Level Support Vector Machines (DILSVM) where the feature scores can only…”
- Supersparse linear integer models for optimized medical scoring systems (2015, methodology): “M-of-N rule tables were originally proposed as auxiliary models that could be extracted from neural nets (Towell and Shavlik, 1993) but were recently proposed to be trained as stand-alone discrete linear classification models by Chevaleyre et al. (2013).”
- Or's of And's for Interpretable Classification, with Application to Context-Aware Recommender Systems (2015, background): “Or’s of and’s models are also a special case of another form of interpretable model called M of-N rules [12,15,35,42,44], inparticular when M=1.”
- Methods and Models for Interpretable Linear Classification (2014, methodology): “[26] and manages to capture complex relationships between variables through an interesting mechanism using rules (e.”
- Optimized Risk Scores (2017, methodology): “Our algorithm may be used to solve other problems with non-convex penalties and constraints, such as `0-regularized risk minimization [27], or discrete linear classication problems that minimize a convex loss over a small integers [4, 7, 24, 35].”
- A Bayesian Approach to Learning Scoring Systems (2015, unknown): “However, rounded solutions do not approximate well the optimal discrete models, 25 which means that the process of rounding could compromise the quality of the scoring system.”
- The fused lasso penalty for learning interpretable medical scoring systems (2017, methodology): “A scheme to learn binary-weighted linear functions with a hinge loss was proposed by [2].”
- A Provable Algorithm for Learning Interpretable Scoring Systems (2018, methodology): “, [4]): minimizing a convex loss function with discrete weights is NP-complete.”
- Experimental analysis of new algorithms for learning ternary classifiers (2015, methodology): “In this section, we will present three rounding algorithms more elaborated than the initial one provided by [1] and called Round− k − weights:”