The Benefits and Costs of Residential Mobility Programmes for the Poor
By Michael P. Johnson, Helen F. Ladd, Jens Ludwig. 2002
117 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e59de58b21c8a7d5a5346b1afda3571406c2c82
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- G. Galster
- Roger Andersson
- S. Musterd
- Timo Kauppinen
- J. Friedrichs
- Jörg Blasius
- Patrick Sharkey
- M. van Ham
In Gender Studies
In Sociology and Political Science
- G. Galster
- Roger Andersson
- S. Musterd
- Timo Kauppinen
- J. Friedrichs
- Jörg Blasius
- Patrick Sharkey
- M. van Ham
Citations in the corpus
- Social norms in distressed neighbourhoods: testing the Wilson hypothesis (2003, background): “…City or the French programme Politique de la Ville), and the Gautreaux and the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) programmes in the US (cf. Galster & Zobel, 1998; Goetz, 2002; Johnson et al., 2002; Rosenbaum, 1995), are all spatially targeted, and implicitly take a negative neighbourhood effect as given.”
- Housing Mix, Social Mix, and Social Opportunities (2005, background): “These and other considerations have spawned critical followers of the American cases as well (Briggs 1997; Galster and Zobel 1998; Galster 2002a; Johnson, Ladd, and Ludwig 2002).”
- What Mix Matters? Exploring the Relationships between Individuals' Incomes and Different Measures of their Neighbourhood Context (2007, background): “, 2002 ; Kearns, 2002 ; Musterd, 2002 ), this goal of enhancing the mix of social groups at the neighbourhood level has been sought through two common programmatic strategies.”