Vertical mixing schemes in the coastal ocean: Comparison of the level 2.5 Mellor‐Yamada scheme with an enhanced version of the K profile parameterization

By S. M. Durski, S. Glenn, Dale B. Haidvogel. 2004

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Development of a three-dimensional, regional, coupled wave, current, and sediment-transport model (2008, methodology): “…is based on the stability frequency; (ii) a user-provided analytical expression such as a constant or parabolic shape; (iii) the K-profile parameterization (Large et al., 1994), expanded to include both surface and bottom-boundary layers by Durski et al., 2004; (iv) Mellor-Yamada level 2.5 (MY2.”
Results from a three-dimensional, nested biological-physical model of the California Current System and comparisons with statistics from satellite imagery (2006, methodology): “5 model was found to provide mixing profiles which varied smoothly in time and space [Durski et al., 2004].”
Density Stratification, Turbulence, but How Much Mixing? (2008, background): “Although many closure schemes have been proposed, there is now a particular focus on the performance of these models in boundary and coastal regions (e.g., Durski et al. 2004).”