Happiness in cross-linguistic & cross-cultural perspective

By Anna Wierzbicka. Daedalus, 2004

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Dædalus Spring 2004 The psychologists David Myers and Ed Diener start their frequently cited article “Who is Happy” with the observation that “Books, books and more books have analyzed human misery. During its 1⁄2rst century, psychology focused far more on negative emotions, such as depression and anxiety, than on positive emotions, such as happiness and satisfaction.” They note with approval that this is now changing quite dramatically.1 There is of course a good reason why books, books, and more books have been written about human misery. Misery and suffering are part and parcel of most lives, whereas happiness is not– or so it has appeared to most people at most times. In the autobiographical novel by the Egyptian-born British writer Ahdaf Soueif, the Egyptian aunt of the Westernized heroine asks her niece why she left her husband. “We were not happy together,” she replies. The aunt raises her eyebrows: “Not happy? Is this sane talk? . . . Who’s happy, child?”2 This exchange is, I think, a characteristic clash of culturally informed thought patterns, values, and expectations. The 1⁄2rst century of psychology, which, as Myers and Diener point out, focused to a far greater extent on negative emotions than on positive ones, was also the century of, inter alia, the two world wars, the Holocaust, the Gulag Archipelago, the millions deliberately or recklessly starved to death in the Ukraine and elsewhere under Stalin and in China under Mao Ze Dong, and the horrors of Pol Pot’s Cambodia. By the end of the twentieth century, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot were all gone, but few of those who watch the evening news on television would say that the human condition has radically changed since the time of their rule. Anna Wierzbicka

Subfields: Cultural Studies, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e345f4ad1a0612483fea9e74ac0dadf4fcea5d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cultural Studies

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Living, and thinking about it: two perspectives on life (2005, background): “Although Oishi's (2002) result suggests that the reports of moment utility are less susceptible than reports of life satisfaction to the effects of cultural disposition, critics will surely question whether any affective self-description can be free of cultural influence (Wierzbicka 2004).”
Language and Metalanguage: Key Issues in Emotion Research (2009, background): “Many languages don’t have a word matching in meaning the English word happy, and, for example, the closest counterparts of happy in German or in Russian imply an emotion more intense than that described by the present-day English happy (e.g., Levontina & Zalizniak, 2001; Wierzbicka, 2004).”
Happiness Economics from 35,000 Feet (2012, unknown): “While there may be some simple, universal concepts, ’happy’, ’satisfied’ and ’wellbeing’ are probably not among them; for example, ’happy’ appears weaker in meaning than straightforward translations in some other European languages—including the French ’heureux’, Italian ’felice’ and Russian ’sčastl”