Social Consumer Neuroscience: Neurophysiological Measures of Advertising Effectiveness in a Social Context
By R. Pozharliev, Willem J. M. I. Verbeke, Richard P. Bagozzi. 2017
99 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The application of neurophysiological methods to study the effects of advertising on consumer purchase behavior has seen an enormous growth in recent years. However, little is known about the role social settings have on shaping the human brain during the processing of advertising stimuli. To address this issue, we first review previous key findings of neuroscience research on advertising effectiveness. Next, we discuss traditional advertising research into the effects social context has on the way consumers experience advertising messages and explain why marketers, who aim to predict advertising effectiveness, should place participants in social settings, in addition to the traditional ways of studying consumer brain responses to advertising in social isolation. This article contributes to the literature by offering advertising researchers a series of research agendas on the key indicators of advertising effectiveness (attention, emotion, memory, and preference). It aims to improve understanding of the impact social context has on consumers' neurophysiological responses to advertising messages.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e25b30e685471c0c5033a544a301e7ac189b4ce
Citations in the corpus
- Neuroimaging Techniques in Advertising Research: Main Applications, Development, and Brain Regions and Processes (2021, unknown): “[45] are 56, 32, 27, 24, 16, 16, and 15, respectively.”
- GLOBAL ACADEMIC TRENDS OF METABOLIC AND ELECTRICAL BIOMEDICAL TOOLS IN MARKETING (2024, unknown): “…context of neuromarketing, MEG, in conjunction with other neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG), provides a direct and unbiased measure of brain activity during the observation of marketing stimuli (Pozharliev et al., 2017).”