How catastrophic can catastrophic forgetting be in linear regression?

By Itay Evron, Edward Moroshko, Rachel A. Ward, Nati Srebro, Daniel Soudry. 2022

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

To better understand catastrophic forgetting, we study fitting an overparameterized linear model to a sequence of tasks with different input distributions. We analyze how much the model forgets the true labels of earlier tasks after training on subsequent tasks, obtaining exact expressions and bounds. We establish connections between continual learning in the linear setting and two other research areas: alternating projections and the Kaczmarz method. In specific settings, we highlight differences between forgetting and convergence to the offline solution as studied in those areas. In particular, when T tasks in d dimensions are presented cyclically for k iterations, we prove an upper bound of T^2 * min{1/sqrt(k), d/k} on the forgetting. This stands in contrast to the convergence to the offline solution, which can be arbitrarily slow according to existing alternating projection results. We further show that the T^2 factor can be lifted when tasks are presented in a random ordering.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Mechanics

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Daniel Soudry
  2. Nati Srebro
  3. René Vidal
  4. Edward Moroshko
  5. Itay Evron
  6. Paris V. Giampouras
  7. Liangzu Peng
  8. Tengyu Ma

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Daniel Soudry
  2. Nati Srebro
  3. René Vidal
  4. Edward Moroshko
  5. Paris V. Giampouras
  6. Itay Evron
  7. Liangzu Peng
  8. Jason D. Lee

Citations in the corpus