dSarm/Sarm1 Is Required for Activation of an Injury-Induced Axon Death Pathway

By Jeannette M. Osterloh, Jing Yang, T. Rooney, A. Fox, R. Adalbert, Eric H. Powell, Amy E Sheehan, M. Avery, R. Hackett, Mary A. Logan and 12 more. Science, 2012

663 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Sarm-Assisted Suicide Neurodegenerative disease or nerve lesions cause axons and synapses to disintegrate through a process known as Wallerian degeneration, which may involve an active “axon death program.” Osterloh et al. (p. 481, published online 7 June; see the Perspective by Yu and Luo) identify loss-of-function mutations in Drosophila dSarm that are capable of blocking the degeneration of severed axons for the fly life span. Deletion of mouse Sarm1 provides similar protection to severed axons for weeks after injury, which suggests that Sarm is part of an ancient axonal death signaling cascade. Mutations in a scaffold protein block the Wallerian degeneration of axons in flies and mice. Axonal and synaptic degeneration is a hallmark of peripheral neuropathy, brain injury, and neurodegenerative disease. Axonal degeneration has been proposed to be mediated by an active autodestruction program, akin to apoptotic cell death; however, loss-of-function mutations capable of potently blocking axon self-destruction have not been described. Here, we show that loss of the Drosophila Toll receptor adaptor dSarm (sterile α/Armadillo/Toll-Interleukin receptor homology domain protein) cell-autonomously suppresses Wallerian degeneration for weeks after axotomy. Severed mouse Sarm1 null axons exhibit remarkable long-term survival both in vivo and in vitro, indicating that Sarm1 prodegenerative signaling is conserved in mammals. Our results provide direct evidence that axons actively promote their own destruction after injury and identify dSarm/Sarm1 as a member of an ancient axon death signaling pathway.

Subfields: Aging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7df6554b0e6fd634fdaa15ac9ef3b176e440bb3c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. Changlong Li
  2. P. Huber
  3. Lu Zhang
  4. Wei Gao
  5. Xiao-Bo Zhou
  6. B. Zou
  7. Canhua Huang
  8. N. Xie

Citations in the corpus