Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the decay B0 → K∗0μ+μ−

By R. Aaij, C. Abellan Beteta, B. Adeva, M. Adinolfi, C. Adrover, A. Affolder, Z. Ajaltouni, J. Albrecht, Federico Alessio, M. Alexander and 488 more. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2013

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7da7fd49950e989b2dc5e2da0b560d6a8ca5ac7f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Citations in the corpus

B →Vℓ+ℓ− in the Standard Model from light-cone sum rules (2015, methodology): “At low q2 and for φ(K∗)γ final state (i.e. q2 = 0) the central values of the LHCb results show the opposite effect.”
Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the B+ → K+μ+μ− decay (2012, unknown): “Candidates with mK+µ+µ− 5170 MeV/c 2 were also removed to reject backgrounds from partially reconstructed B decays, such as B0 → K∗0µ+µ−.”
Global analysis of b → sℓℓ anomalies (2015, methodology): “Second, our definition of the optimised observables Pi in terms of the angular coefficients Ji is different from the definition used by the LHCb collaboration [58].”
On the anomalies in the latest LHCb data (2016, methodology): “The experimental errors of the B0 → K∗0μ+μ− decay [107] have been added in quadrature, taking the largest side error in”