Discrimination and Nepotism: The Efficiency of the Anonymity Rule

By Chaim Fershtman, Uri Gneezy, Frank Verboven. The Journal of Legal Studies, 2005

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7da0c3c10012f447a3b8827f33ac095f54168b59

Citations in the corpus

• Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. (2014, unknown): “…60 .66 IN 0.20 [ 0.32, 0.72] M TG C $ OS 2 Sample b 60 .66 IN 0.75 [0.19, 1.30] N TG C $ OS 2 Sample c 60 .66 IN 0.56 [0.02, 1.10] N TG C $ OS 2 Fershtman et al. (2005) 51 BE 0.93 [0.35, 1.51] N TG C $ OS 2 0.07 Sample b 51 BE 0.68 [0.11, 1.25] N TG C $ OS 2 0.13 Study 2 50 IL 0.59 [0.02,…”
• Lab Labor: What can Labor Economists Learn from the Lab? (2010, unknown): “Fershtman, Gneezy, and Verboven (2005) attempt to distinguish between discrimination against people and “nepotism” in favor of one’s own group.”