Minimizing GCV/GML Scores with Multiple Smoothing Parameters via the Newton Method
By Chong Gu, Grace Wahba. 1991
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Young-Ju Kim
- Simon N. Wood
- Ganggang Xu
- Chong Gu
- Marta Avalos
- Jianhua Z. Huang
- Nicole H. Augustin
- M. Jarvis
Citations in the corpus
- Smoothing Parameter and Model Selection for General Smooth Models (2015, unknown): “.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 x0 f 0 (x 0 ) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 x1 f 1 (x 1 ) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 2 4 6 8 x2 f 2 (x 2 ) Figure S4: Shapes of the functions used for the simulation study (from Gu and Wahba, 1991). f 3(x 3) = 0. penalized parameter βi of gj dβˆ i/dρj d(RTz)i/dρj ≃ βˆ i (1 +λjΛ”
- Smoothing spline Gaussian regression: more scalable computation via efficient approximation (2004, methodology): “Fits with (cid:11) = 1 and q = n by ssanova1 have been checked against (cid:12)ts by the ssanova suite powered by the O ( n 3 ) algorithms of Gu et al. (1989) and Gu and Wahba (1991) for numerical consistency.”
- Weak-Lensing Results from the 75 Square Degree Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory Survey (2003, methodology): “We instead use a smoothing spline algorithm developed by Gu & Wahba (1991), which is available fromNetLib as Rkpack.7 As noted in x 7.5 by BJ02, the convolution is efficient, because each of the 7 7 kernel components is the result of three successive 3 3 kernel convolutions.”
- GAMs with integrated model selection using penalized regression splines and applications to environmental modelling (2002, methodology): “Key words: smoothing, additive, model, selection, GCV Preprint submitted to Elsevier Science 18 May 2002”
- Modelling and smoothing parameter estimation with multiple quadratic penalties (2000, methodology): “I will again follow Gu and Wahba (1991) and update the variablesηi = log θi by Newton’s method (see Gillet al. 1981).”
- Parsimonious additive models (2007, methodology): “…(used at each step of the backfitting procedure in BRUTO, (Hastie and Tibshirani, 1990), optimized by a Newton method, (Gu and Wahba, 1991; Wood, 2000), or combined with a diagonalization technique for penalized splines, (Ruppert et al., 2003)), Akaike information criteria (Hastie and…”
- Asymptotic optimality and efficient computation of the leave-subject-out cross-validation (2012, methodology): “We developed an efficient algorithm to minimizing LsoCV∗(W,λ) with respect to λ for a pre-given W based on the works of Gu and Wahba (1991) and Wood (2004).”