How to eat an elephant: a bottom-up approach to climate policy

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Would Border Carbon Adjustments Prevent Carbon Leakage and Heavy Industry Competitiveness Losses? Insights From a Meta-Analysis of Recent Economic Studies (2014, unknown): “International climate agreements are likely to remain sulglobal in the years to come: the global climate architecture is shifting from a UNFCCC-led top-down regime to a bottom-up approach (Rayner, 2010).”
The Paris Agreement and the inherent inconsistency of climate policymaking (2016, background): “5 C), from which all further steps are rigorously derived.(22,23) While the top-down paradigm has not been abandoned as a political ideal, it is effectively being eroded and replaced by the more practical bottom-up approach.”
A Polycentric Approach to Global Climate Governance (2017, background): “2015), bottom-up efforts (Rayner 2010), or recommendations from the orchestration and building-blocks literature (Hale and Roger 2014).”
Carbon Leakage and Competitiveness of Cement and Steel Industries Under the EU ETS: Much Ado About Nothing (2016, background): “With international climate negotiations at a standstill, a world of fragmented regional climate policies is emerging (Rayner, 2010) and the perspective of a”
Sustainable development and equity (2009, methodology): “Concerning participation, a departure from the top-down approach implied in the Kyoto Protocol towards a more voluntary and bottom-up approach has been suggested (Rayner, 2010).”