Gradient flows and geometric active contour models
By Satyanad Kichenassamy, Arun Kumar, Peter J. Olver, Allen R. Tannenbaum, Anthony J. Yezzi Jr.. 1995
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Daniel Cremers
- Thomas Brox
- Stefano Soatto
- Luc Van Gool
- Stanley J. Osher
- Jitendra Malik
- Andrea Vedaldi
- Lei Zhang
Citations in the corpus
- Deep Level Sets: Implicit Surface Representations for 3D Shape Inference (2019, methodology): “The level set method introduced in [8, 26], and successfully applied in segmentation and medical image analysis [18, 32], is a mathematically elegant way of implicitly representing shape of an object and its boundary evolution in time, which can be represented as a zero level set of an embedding fun”
- Natural Image Statistics for Natural Image Segmentation (2003, unknown): “In this sense, our work is similar to Paragios and Deriche [18] who successfully enhance the geodesic active contour model [3, 12] with a Gaussian mixt ure model of filter response statistics for supervised texture segmentation.”
- A Review of Statistical Approaches to Level Set Segmentation: Integrating Color, Texture, Motion and Shape (2007, background): “See Caselles et al. (1995) and Kichenassamy et al. (1995) for details.”
- Distance Regularized Level Set Evolution and Its Application to Image Segmentation (2010, background): “These desirable features, among others, have greatly promoted further development of level set methods and their applications in image segmentation [10]–[12], [7], [13]–[16], tracking [14],”
- CURVES: Curve evolution for vessel segmentation (2001, methodology): “Curve evolution schemes for segmentation, implemented with level set methods, have become an important approach in computer vision (Caselleset al. 1997; Kichenassamy et al. 1995; Malladi et al. 1994; Sethian 1996).”
- Reconciling distance functions and level sets (2000, methodology): “These evolutions were reformulated by Caselles, Kimmel and Sapiro [7] and by Kichenassamy et al. [ 16 ] in the context of PDE-driven curves and surfaces.”
- Active Contours without Edges for Vector-Valued Images (2000, unknown): “For another related approach, see also [9].”
- TouchCut: Fast image and video segmentation using single-touch interaction (2014, background): “Further, in some use cases (e.g. deployment in high throughput, or multi-tasking situations such as driving) the high cognitive load required to trace outlines or regions may also be undesirable.”
- Motion Competition: A Variational Approach to Piecewise Parametric Motion Segmentation (2005, background): “Level set based contour representations have become a popular framework in image segmentation (cf. Caselles et al. 1995; Kichenassamy et al., 1995; Chan and Vese, 2001), because they do not depend on a particular choice of parameterization, and because they do not restrict the topology of the evolvi”
- Shape Priors for Level Set Representations (2002, unknown): “In the absence of regional information, we can consider the geodesic active contour model [3,9] that only makes use of boundary information.”
- State of the art survey on MRI brain tumor segmentation. (2013, unknown): “[98] and Yezzi et al.”
- Continuous Global Optimization in Multiview 3D Reconstruction (2007, background): “the snakes and the geodesic active contours (Caselles et al. 1995; Kichenassamy et al. 1995) can then be expressed by means of a weighted total variation (TV) norm (Rudin et al.”
- Implicit Surface Representations As Layers in Neural Networks (2019, methodology): “The level set method introduced in [8, 27], and successfully applied in segmentation and medical image analysis [18, 33], is a mathematically elegant way of implicitly representing shape of an object and its boundary evolution in time, which can be represented as a zero level set of an embedding fun”
- Images as Embedded Maps and Minimal Surfaces: Movies, Color, Texture, and Volumetric Medical Images (2000, background): “, 1994; El-Fallah and Ford, 1998; Yanowitz and Bruckstein, 1989; Malladi and Sethian, 1996), some even used the image information to build a Riemannian metric for segmentation (Caselles et al., 1995; Kichenassamy et al., 1995; Shah, 1996a).”
- MRI Segmentation of the Human Brain: Challenges, Methods, and Applications (2015, background): “Intraditional deformable models, image forces come primarily from the local edge-based information (e.g., based on the gradients of sharp image intensities) [95–97].”
- A general framework for low level vision (1998, background): “If we further specify , where is the original image, we arrive at div which is the core (up to the normalization factor) of what is known in the literature as the geodesic active contours [4]–[6], [21], [40].”
- A quasi-dense approach to surface reconstruction from uncalibrated images (2005, methodology): “…properties have been established, the weighted minimal surface formulation was introduced by Caselles and Kimmel [5] and Kichenassamy et al. [23] for 3D segmentation from 3D images, i.e., the 3D surfaces they seek are those minimizing the functional R R wds using the weight w ¼ g ðr I Þ…”