Smart contracts: security patterns in the ethereum ecosystem and solidity

By Maximilian Wöhrer, Uwe Zdun. 2018 International Workshop on Blockchain Oriented Software Engineering (IWBOSE), 2018

315 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d7ce972902c66f4a506c7f35f13aaba40a58880

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The Roadmap to 6G Security and Privacy (2021, unknown): “The accurate functionality of smart contacts can be checked by identifying semantic flaws [101], [102], using security check tools [103], [104], [105] and performing formal verification [106]–[109].”
Decentralized Applications: The Blockchain-Empowered Software System (2018, background): “Security issues in smart contracts has been investigated in many previous works [34]–[36].”
Blockchain for 5G and Beyond Networks: A State of the Art Survey (2019, background): “core software on blockchain, is also very important since a small bug or attack can result in significant issues like privacy leakage or system logic modifications [297], [298].”
A Survey of Blockchain Technology Applied to Smart Cities: Research Issues and Challenges (2019, background): “For a more insightful discussion on smart contracts, please refer to [87] and [91].”
Smart Contract Development: Challenges and Opportunities (2021, background): “These studies mainly aimed to explore the characteristics and potential impact of smart contracts [11], [69], summarize development patterns or lessons [151], [37], evaluate existing programming languages and techniques [112], [53], propose some feasible strategies for smart contract programming and”
A Survey on Ethereum Systems Security (2019, background): “When detecting a violation, various mechanisms (D51) have been proposed for mitigating the damage: (i) disabling the vulnerable smart contract or sensitive functionalities by using (for example) the emergency stop mechanism [183]; (ii) adopting a stake-placing mechanism to assure that any invocation”