Linguistic politeness research: Quo vadis?
By R. Watts. 2006
109 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d77ce1746a7d25146277f989b747c616d048796
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
In Literature and Literary Theory
Citations in the corpus
- Politeness and impoliteness (2011, unknown): “Although, as we have already seen, some researchers have referred to the notion of a frame, it is Marina Terkourafi (e.g. 2001, 2002, 2003, 2005a, 2005b) who goes the whole hog and creates the frame-based approach to politeness, anchoring it in pragmatic theory.”
- The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative (2007, background): “(Watts 2005: xix) However, in their attempts to force a shift in the way researchers approach the study of politeness the utility of the notion of politeness itself has come under scrutiny, a consequence perhaps of the underlying postmodern agenda to deconstruct and thereby challenge long-held…”
- Epilogue: The first-second order distinction in face and politeness research (2012, background): “…et al. (1992), and its critical importance expanded upon by Eelen (2001), it has come to occupy a key place in our theorization of im/politeness (Mills 2003; Watts 2003; Locher 2004; Locher and Watts 2005; LPRG 2011), and more recently face (Terkourafi 2007, 2009; O’Driscoll 2011; Sifianou 2011).”