Introduction: Population Biology, Evolution, and Control of Invasive Species

By F. Allendorf, L. Lundquist. 2003

898 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d73915a8dfed61cafce7e99b6347ee8c480153f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Disappearing giants: a review of threats to freshwater megafauna (2017, background): “Species invasion is regarded as a major threat to global biodiversity, although its relative contribution to species decline and extinction is debatable as native species and their habitats are usually also subject to various other anthropogenic threats simultaneously.(133,134) Due to their large bo”
Using invasive species to study evolution. Case studies with Drosophila and salmon (2005, background): “Furthermore, the relevance of the evolution of invasive species to conservation issues is increasingly appreciated (Vermeij 1996; Mooney and Cleland 2001; Allendorf and Lundquist 2003; Stockwell et al. 2003).”
Ecological Effects of Invasive Arthropod Generalist Predators (2006, background): “For AGP, as for other taxa (Allendorf & Lundquist 2003), invasion success reflects not just performance once in the introduced range, but also the number of 100 Snyder · Evans A nn u.”
The worldwide expansion of the Argentine ant (2010, background): “Introduced populations of invasive species are expected to be less genetically diverse than native populations because of a low number of successfully dispersing individuals (Allendorf & Lundquist, 2003).”
Multiple introductions determine the genetic structure of an invasive species population: American mink Neovison vison in Poland (2010, background): “Therefore, genetic diversity is expected to decline across the expanding range of an exotic species (Allendorf and Lundquist, 2003; Rollins et al., 2009).”
Genomics and the future of conservation genetics (2010, background): “This could partially explain the paradox of invasive species that have lost genetic variation during a bottleneck associated with their introduction but are nonetheless able to adapt to new environmental condition”
Higher genetic diversity in introduced than in native populations of the mussel Mytella charruana: evidence of population admixture at introduction sites (2009, neutral): “The success of invasive species despite bottlenecks has been referred to as a ‘genetic paradox’ ( Allendorf & Lundquist, 2003 ).”
Natural selection for resistance to the allelopathic effects of invasive plants (2005, background): “Ecology has been emphasized over evolution in research on the biological effects of exotic plant invasions (Rice & Emery 2003), and almost all evolutionary research on this topic has focused on the invaders themselves (Baker 1992; Ellstrand & Schierenbeck 2000; Siemann & Rogers 2001; Grosholz 2002; ”
Predator recognition of native but not invasive turtle predators by naïve anuran tadpoles (2010, background): “The advantage of an evolutionary release may explain why invasive species sometimes enjoy a competitive advantage over locally adapted species (Blossey & Nötzold 1995; Shea & Chesson 2002; Allendorf & Lundquist 2003).”
The Biology of Invasions: The Genetic Adaptation Paradox (2006, background): “There are several approaches to explain the success of some alien species in new environments: Allendorf and Lundquist (2003) argue that some species may be intrinsically better competitors because they evolved in a more competitive environment.”
Origin and genetic diversity of mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) introduced to Europe (2010, positive): “(Sax and Brown 2000; Allendorf and Lundquist 2003); and (2) why do invasive species flourish despite reduced genetic diversity in the recipient region?”
A paradox of trout invasions in North America (2008, background): “Likewise, Allendorf and Lundquist (2003) proposed that introduced species may outperform native species in the short term, because the natives are constrained by adaptations for periodic disturbances that occur only on longer time scales.”
HOW INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION INFLUENCE CONTEMPORARY INVASION DYNAMICS (2004, background): “…to these ecological processes, a number of evolutionary processes, such as hybridization and strong selection, have also been shown to occur in introduced populations over short time scales (Thompson 1998, Sakai et al. 2001, Hänfling and Kollman 2002, Lee 2002, Allendorf and Lundquist 2003).”
Recent emergence and worldwide spread of the red tomato spider mite, Tetranychus evansi: genetic variation and multiple cryptic invasions (2010, background): “Unfortunately, regulation generally does not take into account the fact that some genotypes of an invasive species may differ in invasive potential (Allendorf and Lundquist 2003).”
Ecology and genetics of tree invasions: from recent introductions to Quaternary migrations (2004, background): “to episodic climatic events) which have not evolved yet in recent immigrants, especially in long-lived organisms such as trees (Allendorf and Lundquist, 2003).”