Understanding Gender and Intimate Partner Violence from an International Perspective

By Barbara Krahé, Steffen Bieneck, Ingrid Möller. 2005

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d5cb8b616bff04defec592041473ad8398e8ea2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Jennifer E. Caldwell
2. V. D. Woodbrown
3. M. J. Rogers
4. Suzanne C. Swan
5. D. Follingstad

In Health

1. M. J. Rogers
2. Jennifer E. Caldwell
3. V. D. Woodbrown
4. Suzanne C. Swan
5. D. Follingstad

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. J. Rogers
2. Jennifer E. Caldwell
3. V. D. Woodbrown
4. Suzanne C. Swan
5. D. Follingstad

Citations in the corpus

• Gender differences in intimate partner violence outcomes. (2012, background): “Studies with female victims have found links between IPV and poor general health (Campbell, 2002; Plichta, 2004) and functioning (Campbell, 2002; Krahé et al., 2005), disability (Krahé et al., 2005; Plichta, 2004), and frequent receipt of medical treatment (Campbell, 2002; Plichta, 2004).”
• Validity Concerns in the Measurement of Women’s and Men’s Report of Intimate Partner Violence (2013, background): “However, the most relevant criticism of using checklists to assess IPV has been the absence of any context for the behavior or any outcome resulting from the behavior (Krahé et al. 2005).”