Reporting guidelines for controlled experiments in software engineering

By Andreas Jedlitschka, Dietmar Pfahl. International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2005

296 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d543cf8af92580e398f60f5d1a924962ea68baa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies on Learning Analytics Dashboards: A Self-Regulated Learning Perspective (2020, background): “We particularly refer to some technology-related ﬁelds such as empirical software engineering from which empirical research on user-centered learning analytics systems can learn and which have guidelines how results should be reported and threats to validity discussed [99], [100].”
Empirical Studies of Pair Programming for CS/SE Teaching in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review (2011, background): “In order to improve the quality of empirical research, researchers can refer to available guidelines for conducting empirical research in SE [37] and for reporting controlled experiments in SE [30].”
A systematic review on regression test selection techniques (2010, methodology): “Jedlitschka and Pfahl [24]for experiments and Runeson and Höst [52] for case studies.”
Experimentation in Software Engineering (2012, methodology): “Jedlitschka and Pfahl propose a scheme for the academic reporting of experiments [86] which was later evaluated by Kitchenham et al.”
Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering (2009, background): “…2) its conclusions are based on a clear chain of evidence, whether qualitative or quantitative, collected from multiple sources in a planned and consistent manner, and 3) it adds to existing knowledge by being based on previously established theory, if such exist, or by building theory.”
Reporting Experiments in Software Engineering (2008, background): “Conclusion: The resulting checklist provides detailed guidance on the expected content of the sections and subsections for reporting a specific type of empirical studies, i.e., experiments (controlled experiments and quasi-experiments).”