RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS
By R. Bradley, M. E. Terry. 1952
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Robert Tibshirani
- Sourav Chatterjee
- Martin J. Wainwright
- Francis R. Bach
- Trevor J. Hastie
- Stefan Wager
- David R. Hunter
- Jian Huang
Citations in the corpus
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model (2023, methodology): “Like existing algorithms, DPO relies on a theoretical preference model (such as the Bradley-Terry model; [5]) that measures how well a given reward function aligns with empirical preference data.”
- Improving alignment of dialogue agents via targeted human judgements (2022, methodology): “Preference reward models As described in section 2.5, our preference RMs are all Bradley-Terry (Elo) models (Bradley and Terry, 1952) of the same form as Ziegler et al. (2019).”
- Generalized Results for the Existence and Consistency of the MLE in the Bradley-Terry-Luce Model (2021, methodology): “Among them, the renown Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) model (Bradley & Terry, 1952; Luce, 2012) has experienced a surge in popularity and use, due to its high interpretability and expressive power.”
- From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipeline (2024, methodology): “Following Chatbot Arena, we adopt the Bradley-Terry [5] model to produce model’s the final model scores.”
- Offline A/B Testing for Recommender Systems (2018, methodology): “Good examples of distributions are the BradleyTerry Luce (BTL) model [3], the Placket-Luce model [4, 7, 20] or more generally Thurstonian models [26, 28].”
- Extrapolating Beyond Suboptimal Demonstrations via Inverse Reinforcement Learning from Observations (2019, methodology): “This form of loss function follows from the classic Bradley-Terry and Luce-Shephard models of preferences (Bradley & Terry, 1952; Luce, 2012) and has been shown to be effective for training neural networks from preferences (Christiano et al., 2017; Ibarz et al., 2018).”
- Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with Finite-Time Guarantees (2020, unknown): “The comparisons are generated following the Bradley-Terry-Luce model [9]: φ(τ1, τ2) = 1 1+exp(−(r(τ1)−r(τ2))/c) , with c being either 0.”
- Statistical ranking and combinatorial Hodge theory (2008, background): “The third and fourth models are known as linear model [32] and Bradley-Terry model [6] respectively in the statistics and psychology literature.”
- RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling (2024, methodology): “…model involves training a classifier to predict the human preference probability, p ∗ , between two answers, as modeled by a Bradley-Terry model (Bradley and Terry, 1952): Then, estimate the parameters of the reward model by optimizing the maximum likelihood loss as follows: For language…”
- Preference-based interactive multi-document summarisation (2019, methodology): “The Bradley-Terry (BT) model (Bradley and Terry 1952) is a widely used preference learning model, which approximates the ranking σ ∗ x by approximating the utility function U ∗ x : Suppose we have observed N preferences: , where y i, 1 , y i, 2 ∈ Y x are the summaries presented to the oracle in the…”